Keep your tools.
Give them a shared product model.
Your planning, coding, search and review tools already do important work. GitMir adds reusable Product Intelligence: what the product does now, what you are trying to change, what actually changed, and how it got here.
KEEP YOUR EXISTING WORKFLOW.
Choose what you already use.
The label on each row says how GitMir and that tool work together today. It is not a statement about a partnership between the two companies.
Coding agents
Start coding tasks with product understanding, not only repository exploration.
CursorWorkflowAdd reusable product context to the agent and tools you already use.
CodexWorkflowGive Codex product-level context before it drills into implementation.
Planning and work
Connect planned work to current product state and to the change that actually landed.
JiraWorkflowAdd product-level impact and change traceability to engineering work items.
Code intelligence
Use Product Intelligence to decide what matters; use Sourcegraph to locate implementation evidence.
AugmentWorkflowAdd product meaning above high-quality code context.
Review and governance
- Workflow — The two products are used side by side, by a person or by the agent they run. Nothing passes directly between them.
Common stack combinations.
Intent, expected product change, implementation, observed product change.
Cursor + CodeRabbit + GitMirWorkflowOne change, three layers, no overlap.
Jira + Claude Code + GitMirWorkflowLess repeated reconstruction, more traceability after the fact.
Sourcegraph + Claude Code + GitMirWorkflowTwo levels, in the order that costs least.
Augment + Claude Code + GitMirWorkflowTwo context sources, one agent.
One product understanding across the workflow.
- PlanLinear · Jira
- Product IntelligenceGitMir
- BuildClaude Code · Cursor · Codex
- Code intelligenceSourcegraph · Augment
- ReviewCodeRabbit
- Product change historyGitMir
A conceptual workflow map, not a wiring diagram: the products named here are not connected to each other through GitMir.
One run, published in full.
The one measurement GitMir has published is a 50-question run over a single repository, Supabase. It compared context systems answering the same questions, graded blind against repository evidence.
No combination of tools named in this section has been measured, and no page here claims a result for one.
What this section is, and what it is not.
Do we have to change tools?
No. That is the point of this section. Every page here describes GitMir used beside a tool you already run.
Is any of this a joint product with the companies named here?
No. The names are product references. Nothing on these pages describes an agreement between the two companies.
What does the label at the top of each page mean?
Workflow — The two products are used side by side, by a person or by the agent they run. Nothing passes directly between them. Every page in this section carries that label today. A stronger one goes up only when we can show the session that earned it.
What has actually been measured?
One run, published in full on the benchmarks page: fifty questions over a single repository, comparing context systems answering the same questions. No combination of tools named in this section has been measured, and no page here claims otherwise.
Keep your stack. Add the product layer.
Connect one repository and see what changes when your people and your agents work from the same product understanding.
3,000 STARTING CREDITS INCLUDED · YOU SEE THE ESTIMATE BEFORE A BUILD STARTS · PROCESSING STOPS WITH YOUR BALANCE AND RESUMES AFTER A TOP-UP