Sign up
Works with your engineering stack

Keep your tools
Give them the business logic

Your planning, coding, search and review tools already do important work. Coding agents connect to GitMir directly through GitMir Vibe — one MCP server. Everything else works beside GitMir, with the same product understanding: what the product does now, what you are trying to change and what actually changed.

See it on a real productUse GitMir with my product ↗

KEEP YOUR EXISTING WORKFLOW.

Choose what you already use

The label on each row says how GitMir and that tool work together today. It is not a statement about a partnership between the two companies.

Direct through GitMir Vibe

One MCP server — https://vibe.gitmir.com/mcp. The agent signs in, connects the repository through GitHub and asks the product model before it writes.

Claude CodeGitMir Vibe

Add GitMir Vibe with one line. Coding tasks start from product understanding, not only repository exploration.

CursorGitMir Vibe

Add GitMir Vibe in one click. The agent gets reusable product context beside the tools you already use.

CodexGitMir Vibe

Add GitMir Vibe with one command. Codex gets product-level context before it drills into implementation.

VS CodeGitMir Vibe

Add GitMir Vibe in one click. The agent in VS Code asks the product model before it edits.

Works beside GitMir

Nothing is wired between these tools and GitMir. A person, or the agent they run, carries the work across.

Planning and work

LinearWorkflow

Connect planned work to current product state and to the change that actually landed.

JiraWorkflow

Add product-level impact and change traceability to engineering work items.

Code intelligence

SourcegraphWorkflow

Use Product Intelligence to decide what matters; use Sourcegraph to locate implementation evidence.

AugmentWorkflow

Add product meaning above high-quality code context.

Review and governance

CodeRabbitWorkflow

Combine independent change review with a persistent product-level before and after.

  • GitMir Vibe — Connected directly through GitMir Vibe: one MCP server added to this client. The agent signs in, connects the repository through GitHub and asks the product model from inside the client.
  • Workflow — The two products are used side by side, by a person or by the agent they run. Nothing passes directly between them.

Common stack combinations

Claude Code + Linear + GitMirWorkflow

Intent, expected product change, implementation, observed product change

Cursor + CodeRabbit + GitMirWorkflow

One change, three layers, no overlap

Jira + Claude Code + GitMirWorkflow

Less repeated reconstruction, more traceability after the fact

Sourcegraph + Claude Code + GitMirWorkflow

Two levels, in the order that costs least

Augment + Claude Code + GitMirWorkflow

Two context sources, one agent

The flow

One product understanding across the workflow

  1. PlanLinear · Jira
  2. Product IntelligenceGitMir
  3. BuildClaude Code · Cursor · Codex
  4. Code intelligenceSourcegraph · Augment
  5. ReviewCodeRabbit
  6. Product change historyGitMir

A conceptual workflow map. Claude Code, Cursor, Codex and VS Code reach GitMir through GitMir Vibe; the planning, search and review tools named here are not connected to GitMir or to each other.

What has been measured

One run, published in full

The one measurement GitMir has published is a 50-question run over a single repository, Supabase. It compared context systems answering the same questions, graded blind against repository evidence.

8%of the answer score lost to errors and omissions, against 22% for the best-scoring alternative in that run
8.4Ktokens of context per question, against 27.4K
$0.07per question, against $0.19
Not measured

No combination of tools named in this section has been measured, and no page here claims a result for one.

See benchmark methodology
Questions

What this section is, and what it is not

Do we have to change tools?

No. That is the point of this section. Every page here describes GitMir used beside a tool you already run.

Is any of this a joint product with the companies named here?

No. The names are product references. Nothing on these pages describes an agreement between the two companies.

What does the label at the top of each page mean?

GitMir Vibe — Connected directly through GitMir Vibe: one MCP server added to this client. The agent signs in, connects the repository through GitHub and asks the product model from inside the client. Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, VS Code carry it today. Workflow — The two products are used side by side, by a person or by the agent they run. Nothing passes directly between them. Linear, Jira, CodeRabbit, Sourcegraph, Augment carry that one.

What has actually been measured?

One run, published in full on the benchmarks page: fifty questions over a single repository, comparing context systems answering the same questions. No combination of tools named in this section has been measured, and no page here claims otherwise.

Add one server. Keep Claude Code

Run the line above, sign in once and ask Claude Code to connect the repository. It works from the product model from then on.

Use GitMir with my product

10,000 STARTING CREDITS INCLUDED · YOU SEE THE ESTIMATE BEFORE A BUILD STARTS · PROCESSING STOPS WITH YOUR BALANCE AND RESUMES AFTER A TOP-UP