Give a Jira change product context before Claude Code starts.
The work item says what should change. GitMir says what the product does now and what the change would reach. Claude Code implements it, and the product-level difference is kept afterwards.
KEEP YOUR EXISTING WORKFLOW.
Workflow The two products are used side by side, by a person or by the agent they run. Nothing passes directly between them.
What these tools already do well.
Jira
- Runs the work system the whole company reports against
- Connects work items to the knowledge and the code around them
- Serves people and agents from the same record of the work
Keep Jira as the work system. Add a product-state layer to every change.
Claude Code
- Explores a repository and reads files in place
- Edits code, runs tools and runs commands
- Follows the instructions a project checks in
- Connects to external systems through MCP
Keep all of that. Add a reusable representation of the product it is working on.
Who does what
- Jira — the work item and the reporting around it
- GitMir — current and expected product state, and the difference afterwards
- Claude Code — the implementation
Less repeated reconstruction, more traceability after the fact.
Today
- Work item
- Agent explores the repository
- Reconstruct the behavior involved
- Implement
- Close the work item
With GitMir
- Work item
- Current and expected product state
- Implement
- Product-level difference across analyzed commits
The loop, end to end
- Jira work itemthe requested change
- GitMircurrent state, expected state, task context
- Claude Codeimplementation
- Commitswhat actually landed
- GitMirproduct-level difference across analyzed commits
A workflow map. GitMir does not read Jira and does not update it.
See the product state the work item would be read against.
On the public Supabase model, a product question is answered from the model and returned with the files behind it — the same step this workflow puts before implementation.
What could break if subscription cancellation changes?
An example, so you can see the answer without uploading anything of yours.
- Areas it reachesBilling & Subscription · Support · Usage · Project Settings · Organization
- RecordsSubscription · DiskAttributes · OrganizationUsage
- Actions · 9updateOrgSubscription · confirmPendingSubscriptionChange · sendDowngradeFeedback
- Endpoints · 8PUT /platform/organizations/{slug}/billing/subscription · POST /platform/feedback/downgrade
- Screens · 7cancel or downgrade the subscription · change the plan
- Customer pathsChange an organization's plan
One run, published in full.
The one measurement GitMir has published is a 50-question run over a single repository, Supabase. It compared context systems answering the same questions, graded blind against repository evidence.
Jira with Claude Code has not been run against Jira, Claude Code and GitMir on the same repository, so this page claims no result for that combination.
See what changed in the product — not only what changed in the code.
GitMir updates the product representation from analyzed commits and keeps the product-level difference between versions: what the product does, the rules behind it, the things it works with, and the areas they touch.
Keep your stack. Add the product layer.
Connect one repository and give the next work item a product state to be read against.
3,000 STARTING CREDITS INCLUDED · YOU SEE THE ESTIMATE BEFORE A BUILD STARTS · PROCESSING STOPS WITH YOUR BALANCE AND RESUMES AFTER A TOP-UP