Claude Code can read your code.
Give it your product.
GitMir gives Claude Code a compact, reusable model of what your product already does, the work being requested, and how the product has changed — so the task can start closer to meaning and drill into code where the implementation requires it.
KEEP YOUR EXISTING WORKFLOW.
Workflow The two products are used side by side, by a person or by the agent they run. Nothing passes directly between them.
What Claude Code already does well.
Claude Code
- Explores a repository and reads files in place
- Edits code, runs tools and runs commands
- Follows the instructions a project checks in
- Connects to external systems through MCP
Keep all of that. Add a reusable representation of the product it is working on.
What GitMir adds
- A compact model of what the product does and how it behaves
- The things the product works with — areas, records, actions, screens
- The customer paths a change would touch, and how states change along them
- Incoming requirements, and the development tasks they turn into
- Product-level change across analyzed commits
- One product context that people and agents read the same way
Spend less of the task reconstructing what already exists.
Claude Code today
- Task
- Repository and the context tools you have
- Retrieve implementation evidence
- Reconstruct the behavior involved
- Reason
- Implement
Claude Code + GitMir
- Task
- Current product model, the task, and what changed before it
- Compare current behavior with intended behavior
- Retrieve the exact implementation evidence
- Implement
Neither path is the wrong one. The second starts from a representation that already exists instead of rebuilding it for every task.
Ask a real product the question you would hand the agent.
The Supabase model on this site is a real GitMir model of a real repository, built by the engine described here. Ask it what breaks if subscription cancellation changes: the answer comes from the model, and the files it stands on come with it.
What could break if subscription cancellation changes?
An example, so you can see the answer without uploading anything of yours.
- Areas it reachesBilling & Subscription · Support · Usage · Project Settings · Organization
- RecordsSubscription · DiskAttributes · OrganizationUsage
- Actions · 9updateOrgSubscription · confirmPendingSubscriptionChange · sendDowngradeFeedback
- Endpoints · 8PUT /platform/organizations/{slug}/billing/subscription · POST /platform/feedback/downgrade
- Screens · 7cancel or downgrade the subscription · change the plan
- Customer pathsChange an organization's plan
One run, published in full.
The one measurement GitMir has published is a 50-question run over a single repository, Supabase. It compared context systems answering the same questions, graded blind against repository evidence.
It did not measure Claude Code with GitMir against Claude Code without it. That comparison has not been run, and this page claims no result for it.
Give Claude the product history, not only the Git history.
GitMir keeps product-level change across analyzed commits, so the agent can see when a behavior appeared, how it changed, and what changed around it before it decides what to do next.
What changes, and what does not.
Is GitMir a replacement for Claude Code?
No. Claude Code stays the agent that reads, edits and runs your repository. GitMir changes what it can start from.
Is there a Claude Code setup block on this page?
Not on this page. The current setup lines and your key live in your GitMir account, where they are kept up to date. We publish a client configuration only for a client we have connected ourselves and can show the session for — which is also why the label at the top of this page reads Workflow.
Keep your stack. Add the product layer.
Connect one repository and see what changes when your people and your agents work from the same product understanding.
3,000 STARTING CREDITS INCLUDED · YOU SEE THE ESTIMATE BEFORE A BUILD STARTS · PROCESSING STOPS WITH YOUR BALANCE AND RESUMES AFTER A TOP-UP