CTO · founder
See what every push did to the product
In business words — a rule, a customer path, a cycle, a record. A quiet change of contract does not slip through.
GitMir shows what every push actually changed in the product — customer flows, rules, states and dependencies — and which problems appeared or disappeared.
Review product impact. Not thousands of changed lines.
Preview — free for now · reading the push uses credits
Teams shipping with AI open more pull requests than their reviewers can read: Faros AI measured 51% more pull requests, review time up fivefold and 31% of pull requests merged with no review at all. Reading more diffs faster is not the answer — a reviewer’s time goes into rebuilding what the author already knew.
Lines added and removed, in files you have to open to judge.
Which rule now holds differently, which customer path changed, what else depends on it, and whether that was the intent.
Only something that holds the product itself — which is what GitMir builds and keeps current with every push.
The review is what the comparison finds, in the words your team uses for the product.
The product model is built once and kept current. Business Review adds nothing to that reading — it uses the versions it already writes.
GitMir reads it and writes the next version of the model: the parts of the product as they are now, with what each one is.
Not two diffs of code — two states of the product. What the comparison finds is the review.
Customer paths, status flows, rules and records that changed, and which areas now depend on each other. Paths and identifiers stay out of it.
Findings recorded against each version are compared, so a push that introduced a problem and a push that removed one read differently.
Requirements of the documents saved on the project that this push touched are listed with the parts of the product they landed on.
Who it is for
CTO · founder
In business words — a rule, a customer path, a cycle, a record. A quiet change of contract does not slip through.
Team lead · reviewer
Read line by line only where the product changed, and skip what does not change it.
Product manager
Without waiting for the demo — next to the last check of each requirement.
Team where agents write code
People look only where the product changed.
Previewfree for now; the review itself uses no credits
GitMir Business Review starts from what GitMir already knows — and what it adds is there for the next product.
Starts with
Business Review
Review the product, not the diffAdds back
Used next by
Everything here is what the product does today, including where it stops.
The review comes out of two versions of the model. There is no model opinion about your commit, because an opinion is the one thing nobody can check
A version is written when GitMir reads a push, so the review speaks about the push
Where a part has no details recorded, the change is named without them instead of being filled in
A problem is reported as brought or settled only when both versions recorded findings
There is nothing to compare it with, and it is left out of the feed rather than reported as a change
No file paths and no identifiers: processes, rules, records and the areas they belong to
“Code review says how it is written, not what changed in the product”
The review reads the product model, not the diff.
“A rule or a contract changed quietly”
A changed rule, cycle or customer path is named.
“AI writes more code than we can read”
Attention goes to pushes that changed the product; the rest say so, within what was read.
“You can’t check an AI reviewer’s opinion”
It is computed from two versions of the model, and every item links to the drawing.
“Which requirements did this push touch?”
“Requirements it touches”, with the last check of each.
“A push brought a new problem and nobody noticed”
Problems a push added or removed come first.
A push is read by what it did to the product — and what it did differently from what was meant comes first.
Decisions a push goes against, parts its task did not name and new problems — on top, each with what was meant, what changed and why it matters; the rest folded with a count.
Each customer path a push changed opens as before and after — new steps in green, gone steps in red.
Mark a review fine, make a follow-up or ask the author from the card under Needs you — the answer is written to the review.
GitMir Business Review is in preview: everyone who reads a repository sees its reviews. Each push is compared with the product.
Preview — free for now: each push on a project compared with the product model
Not metered. It is computed from versions GitMir already wrote
Uses credits, as every model update does: one credit for every ten lines read
10,000 credits with a new account
Each push is compared with the product model: which processes, status flows, rules and records changed, what now depends on what, and which problems the push brought or settled. Computed from two versions of the model, so there is no opinion a person cannot check.
A code reviewer reads the diff and writes an opinion about it. Business Review compares two versions of your product model and reports what changed in the product — the rules, status flows, customer paths and records — and which problems the push brought or settled. Nothing in it is written by a model about your commit.
It speaks about pushes, not single commits. Every push GitMir reads gets a line: a review when the product changed, “No product changes detected” when it did not, and the reading’s state while it runs or if it stops. The first reading of a repository has nothing to compare with, so it has no review.
Preview — free for now: the review itself costs nothing. Reading the push uses credits, as every model update does.
What went differently from what was meant: decisions the push goes against, parts its task did not name, and new problems — each with what was meant, what changed and why it matters. Everything else is folded with a count.
The review names the customer paths the push changed. Each opens as before and after, side by side — new steps in green, gone steps in red.
Connect a repository; the review starts with the push after its first reading.