CTO · Head of engineering
Know what a change does before it ships
A change shows what it reaches before it merges, not after a customer complains. Senior engineers explain the product less and read fewer diffs.
45 min → 8 minto check one agent task
Give your people and AI a current understanding of the business logic, dependencies and customer flows behind your code — before they make a change.
92% answer quality · 69% less context · 63% lower cost
10,000 credits to start · $29 per active developer / month
Move through the commits to see the business logic change.
Links between areas
Billing & subscription
Billing & subscription ▸ Upgrade the plan
Billing & subscription ▸ Plan status
Billing & subscription ▸ Renew subscription
Access & entitlements
Notifications
Illustrative business logic. On your repository every analysed commit is laid over the real model the same way. Explore a real product
Why teams switch
Today the understanding of how your product works is pieced together again for every task — from files, from people, from memory.
Today
…for every task, every agent and every new hire
With GitMir Intelligence
Rules, customer paths, records and how they connect — read from your code and updated on every push. People ask it, agents get the part a task touches, and every answer names its commit.
Understanding is built once and used by everyone.
Who it is for
One model of the product, read by everyone who works on it — each for their own job.
CTO · Head of engineering
A change shows what it reaches before it merges, not after a customer complains. Senior engineers explain the product less and read fewer diffs.
45 min → 8 minto check one agent task
Developer with an AI agent
Not from files it has to piece together again — in Claude Code, Cursor, Codex or VS Code, over MCP.
92% vs 78%answer quality against the strongest alternative, same model
Product · analyst · QA
Check a PRD against the product before estimates: each requirement already works, contradicts the product, is new, or needs a question.
16 h → 0.3 hfor a PM to size one change
New engineer
How a feature works and why, with the drawing of the product open beside the answer.
21 days → 4 daysto a first accepted change
Founder · product owner
Findings arrive without asking — secrets in plain text, services without a visible access check, a state nothing leaves — each with where it is and what to do.
Finance
Agents get the part of the product a task needs instead of the whole repository.
$0.35 → $0.08AI cost per completed agent action
Measured on projects GitMir has run, and in Benchmark 001 — a measurement of those projects, not a promise about your week.
Same repository. Same questions. Same model. The benchmark changes only what the model knows before it reasons.
BENCHMARK 001 · 50 NATURAL-LANGUAGE QUESTIONS · 3 RUNS EACH · SAME MODEL, BLIND GRADING · SEE FULL METHODOLOGY →
Smaller model · the right meaning
Get more from a simple, cheap model. GitMir hands it the right fragment of your system’s meaning over MCP — not the whole repository — so it answers like a far bigger model, for cents and seconds.
Task 1: An invoice stays unpaid. What happens to the customer? GitMir sends rule “An unpaid invoice restricts the organization”, flow · invoice status “Open”, reaches “Organization · Project”. Answers: Organization — Banner escalates to “services restricted”; Project — Projects restricted after the grace period; Invoice — Only an open invoice offers a payment link. Task 2: Turn the spend cap off. What changes? GitMir sends rule “The spend cap decides whether an overrun costs money or availability”, subscription · field “usage_billing_enabled”. Answers: Usage — Usage past the quota is billed as overage; Project Settings — Disk autoscaling and resizing open up. Task 3: Upgrade an organization to Pro. What must it be told? GitMir sends customer path · step “change the plan”, action “updateOrgSubscription”. Answers: Billing — The prorated price and the new total come first; Payment — A held card check is confirmed before the plan starts; Subscription — The new plan starts at once.
Context and time per task are from Benchmark 001: 8.4K tokens and 4.8 s with GitMir, 61.3K tokens and 18.9 s reading the repository. Priced at list prices, October 2026: DeepSeek V4 Flash $0.14 in / $0.28 out, Claude Opus 5.5 $4 / $20 per million tokens, with a 1,000-token answer. See the benchmark →
In your team’s words.
“The agent only sees the open files, and the rule it breaks lives in another area”
The model keeps the connections. Over MCP the agent gets the parts a task touches — even those that share no word with it.
“A clean diff breaks a customer path”
See what a change reaches before it merges, and check the commit against the model.
“We keep CLAUDE.md and AGENTS.md by hand. Three hotfixes later they describe last year’s product”
MCP always answers from the current commit, and the rules file is written from the model.
“Which version is the agent working from?”
Every push is read, and every answer names the commit it is right for.
“A change in one repository breaks another”
Connect them into one project: one drawing of the seams, and findings across repositories.
“The PRD contradicts the product, and we find out mid-sprint”
Check the document requirement by requirement before anyone estimates it.
Every screen starts with what you came for: what changed, what waits for you, and what a change would reach.
Product, Agents, Against and Needs you — what changed, what agents did, what goes against a decision or a requirement, and what waits for you.
Everything that waits for you comes as one card: the question, two or three options with what each reaches, what you decided before, and a recommendation with its reason.
Open a part of the product again and one line says what changed in it since your last look.
Every commit as two still versions of the product next to each other — what appeared in green, what went in red, the words underneath.
Every customer path by the places a customer gets stuck — a step pointing at nothing, a state with no way forward — each with its reason in words.
Pick a state of a record and see what it can move to, what it cannot from here and why, and the rules and actions that follow.
Before you change a part: the customer paths and areas it reaches, the risk, and what to check on each card.
The same answer for a lead, a product person or an engineer — the same parts, the words of your job.
Over MCP, gitmir_understand gives an agent the prepared answer a person sees, as text — the parts, why each is there, and what was left out.
The drawing loads only the level you open — about ten kilobytes, even when the whole model is megabytes.
Branches move fast, and agents work on several of them at once. An answer from yesterday's code does not look wrong. It just is.
What GitMir tells a person or an agent comes with the commit it was read from. When the branch moves on, you can see that the answer is behind, instead of finding out after the change lands.
If part of a repository could not be read, the model says which part, and you are not charged for it. No complete-looking answer built on half the code.
The model describes committed code. Changes not committed yet, and branches it has not read, are named as outside it, so an agent knows where its knowledge ends.
Ask GitMir directly from Slack. Get product rules, flows, dependencies and change impact without reading the code.
GitMir extracts the business logic from your codebase and keeps it current with every push.
Everyone answers with their own GitMir access: a person sees in Slack exactly what they see in GitMir, and nothing more.
Part of GitMir Intelligence — no separate price, no seat for asking. Questions are not metered on any plan; credits are used only when a repository is read.
@GitMir What happens if we change how an unpaid invoice restricts an organization?
An unpaid invoice restricts the organization: Warning → grace period → restricted.
GitMir Cloud Compute, Vibe, GoBots, Market, ICP, Outreach and MeetAI read this Intelligence and add to it. Each joins a project or an idea in one click — nothing is set up twice.
Credits pay for building and updating models and are shared across GitMir products. Questions from people are not metered on any plan; each question from an AI agent over MCP uses 1–10 credits.
10,000 credits to start · any number of private repositories
$29 per active developer / month · 30,000 pooled credits each · GitMir in Slack included
Private deployment, identity and procurement terms scoped to your company
Connect repositories and GitMir keeps a living model of what the product does. People ask and see it, agents get sufficient context over MCP, and every change shows what it reached.
Any tool that speaks MCP: Claude Code, OpenAI Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot and your own agents. Change the model, keep the Intelligence.
Building the model of your private repositories and keeping it current, and questions from AI agents over MCP: 1–10 credits each. Questions from people, in GitMir and in Slack, are not metered on any plan.
It says so. The model names the parts it could not read, those parts cost nothing, and the next update reads them again. You never get a full-looking answer built on part of the code.
Every answer names the commit it comes from. An agent on another branch sees how far the model is from its own work, and the model catches up with every push to the branch you connect.
Free to start with 10,000 credits. Engineering is $29 per active developer per month with 30,000 pooled credits each; viewers and AI agents add no seat.
Yes. Invite GitMir to a channel or send it a direct message: it answers with product rules, flows and what a change reaches, scoped to what that person can see in GitMir. It is part of GitMir Intelligence at no additional price, and asking is not metered.
Yes. Ask the live model of Supabase Studio what a change would reach — no account needed.
Everything that waits for you — a finished task, a review with problems, a requirement without a decision, an open item from a meeting, a proposal — comes as one card: the question, two or three options with what each one reaches, what you decided before about those parts, and a recommendation with its reason. You choose an option; the answer is written where it belongs and the card goes.
Yes. «Where can a customer get stuck» lists every customer path by the places a customer gets stuck — a step pointing at a part that is no longer there, a state with no way forward, a state nothing leads into — and each path opens with those places marked and their reason in words.
Open «What if it changes» on the part: the customer paths and areas it reaches, the risk, and on each card what to check. A new task opens the same view for the parts it touches.
The same answer is worded for your role — lead, product or engineer. The parts and what is marked stay the same; a lead reads money and risk, a product person what the customer sees, an engineer the states and rules.
Yes. Over MCP, gitmir_understand gives an agent the prepared answer a person sees, as text: the answer line, the parts with why each is there and where it comes from, and what was left out with a way to ask for it.
Open a finished public Intelligence model, ask the questions you would ask about your own system, then decide whether the difference matters.