From planned change to implementation with one product understanding
Linear carries the intent. GitMir adds the current product state and the product history. Claude Code performs the implementation.
KEEP YOUR EXISTING WORKFLOW.
Workflow The two products are used side by side, by a person or by the agent they run. Nothing passes directly between them.
What these tools already do well
Claude Code
Claude Code- Explores a repository and reads files in place
- Edits code, runs tools and runs commands
- Follows the instructions a project checks in
- Connects to external systems through MCP
Keep all of that. Add a reusable representation of the product it is working on.
Linear
Linear- Holds projects, issues, requests and docs in one place
- Gives the whole team a shared planning context
- Uses connected repositories as context for questions and planning
Linear stays the planning system. GitMir adds what the product does now, and what changed after the work shipped.
Who does what
- Linear — the request, the issue, the priority
- GitMir — current behavior, impact, task context, product-level change
- Claude Code — the implementation
Intent, expected product change, implementation, observed product change
Today
- Issue
- Agent explores the repository
- Reconstruct the behavior involved
- Implement
- Close the issue
With GitMir
- Issue
- Current behavior and expected impact
- Implement
- Product change across analyzed commits
- Compare what was asked for with what changed
The loop, end to end
- Linearrequirement or issue
- GitMircurrent behavior, impact, task context
- Claude Codeimplementation
- GitMirproduct change after the commit is analyzed
A workflow map. Claude Code reaches GitMir through GitMir Vibe; Linear is connected to neither — a person, or the agent they run, carries the issue across.
See the product state an issue would be read against
The public Supabase model is the same artifact this workflow uses in its second step: what the product does now, and what a change would reach.
What must an AI agent know before changing billing?
An example, so you can see the answer without uploading anything of yours.
- Areas it reachesBilling & Subscription · Organization · Usage · Partner Onboarding · Project Settings
- RecordsSubscription · Invoice · PaymentMethod · CustomerProfile · Entitlement · ProjectAddon
- Actions · 33updateOrgSubscription · topUpCredits · redeemCode
- Endpoints · 27PUT /platform/organizations/{slug}/billing/subscription · POST .../billing/credits/top-up
- Screens · 33payment methods · organization billing and usage
- Customer pathsChange an organization's plan
One run, published in full
The one measurement GitMir has published is a 50-question run over a single repository, Supabase. It compared context systems answering the same questions, graded blind against repository evidence.
Claude Code with Linear has not been run against Claude Code, Linear and GitMir on the same repository, so this page claims no result for that combination.
See what changed in the product — not only what changed in the code
GitMir updates the product representation from analyzed commits and keeps the product-level difference between versions: what the product does, the rules behind it, the things it works with, and the areas they touch.
Keep your stack. Add the product layer
Connect one repository and run one issue through this loop end to end.
10,000 STARTING CREDITS INCLUDED · YOU SEE THE ESTIMATE BEFORE A BUILD STARTS · PROCESSING STOPS WITH YOUR BALANCE AND RESUMES AFTER A TOP-UP