Product meaning, code context, execution.
Augment supplies the implementation context. GitMir supplies the product model, the intended change and the product history. Claude Code makes the change.
KEEP YOUR EXISTING WORKFLOW.
Workflow The two products are used side by side, by a person or by the agent they run. Nothing passes directly between them.
What these tools already do well.
Augment
- Gives coding agents strong context across large codebases
- Retrieves the implementation detail a change actually touches
- Works across more than one repository
Keep that context engine. GitMir adds what the product means above it.
Claude Code
- Explores a repository and reads files in place
- Edits code, runs tools and runs commands
- Follows the instructions a project checks in
- Connects to external systems through MCP
Keep all of that. Add a reusable representation of the product it is working on.
Who does what
- GitMir — product model, intended change, product-level history
- Augment — the implementation context a change touches
- Claude Code — the implementation
Two context sources, one agent.
Today
- Task
- Implementation context
- Reconstruct the behavior involved
- Implement
With GitMir
- Task
- Product model and intended change
- Implementation context
- Implement
Two sources, one agent
- Taskthe work as it was assigned
- GitMirproduct state, intended change, product history
- Augmentrelevant implementation context
- Claude Codeimplementation
A workflow map. Both sources reach the agent; they do not reach each other.
See what the product layer contributes.
The public Supabase model shows a product-level answer next to the files behind it, which is the clearest way to see what each of the two context sources is for.
What could break if subscription cancellation changes?
An example, so you can see the answer without uploading anything of yours.
- Areas it reachesBilling & Subscription · Support · Usage · Project Settings · Organization
- RecordsSubscription · DiskAttributes · OrganizationUsage
- Actions · 9updateOrgSubscription · confirmPendingSubscriptionChange · sendDowngradeFeedback
- Endpoints · 8PUT /platform/organizations/{slug}/billing/subscription · POST /platform/feedback/downgrade
- Screens · 7cancel or downgrade the subscription · change the plan
- Customer pathsChange an organization's plan
One run, published in full.
GitMir has published one measurement, and it does not speak to this combination. It compared context systems answering the same questions about a single repository — a different thing from the workflow this page describes. The full table, every system in it and the method behind it are on the benchmarks page.
Claude Code with Augment has not been run against Claude Code with Augment and GitMir on the same repository, so this page claims no result for that combination.
Keep your stack. Add the product layer.
Connect one repository and test this stack on work your team is doing anyway.
3,000 STARTING CREDITS INCLUDED · YOU SEE THE ESTIMATE BEFORE A BUILD STARTS · PROCESSING STOPS WITH YOUR BALANCE AND RESUMES AFTER A TOP-UP