Add product meaning above high-quality code context.
Augment already gives coding agents strong context across repositories. GitMir adds a reusable product model, task context and a product-level change history alongside that code intelligence.
KEEP YOUR EXISTING WORKFLOW.
Workflow The two products are used side by side, by a person or by the agent they run. Nothing passes directly between them.
What Augment already does well.
Augment
- Gives coding agents strong context across large codebases
- Retrieves the implementation detail a change actually touches
- Works across more than one repository
Keep that context engine. GitMir adds what the product means above it.
What GitMir adds
- A product model above the implementation context
- The intended change, stated against what the product does today
- Product-level change across analyzed commits
- Context that is reused rather than retrieved again for every task
Product meaning above code context.
Today
- Task
- Relevant implementation context
- Reconstruct the behavior involved
- Implement
With GitMir
- Task
- Product state, intended change, product history
- Relevant implementation context
- Implement
This is an addition, not a substitution: the code context stays exactly where it is in the workflow.
Two sources, one agent
- Taskthe work as it was assigned
- GitMirproduct state, intended change, product history
- Augmentthe implementation context the change touches
- Claude Code · Cursor · Codeximplementation
A workflow map. The two products are not connected to each other; the agent holds both.
See the product layer on a real repository.
The public Supabase model shows what a product-level answer looks like next to the code it points at — with the file list attached, so the two layers can be compared directly.
What could break if subscription cancellation changes?
An example, so you can see the answer without uploading anything of yours.
- Areas it reachesBilling & Subscription · Support · Usage · Project Settings · Organization
- RecordsSubscription · DiskAttributes · OrganizationUsage
- Actions · 9updateOrgSubscription · confirmPendingSubscriptionChange · sendDowngradeFeedback
- Endpoints · 8PUT /platform/organizations/{slug}/billing/subscription · POST /platform/feedback/downgrade
- Screens · 7cancel or downgrade the subscription · change the plan
- Customer pathsChange an organization's plan
One run, published in full.
GitMir has published one measurement, and it does not speak to this combination. It compared context systems answering the same questions about a single repository — a different thing from the workflow this page describes. The full table, every system in it and the method behind it are on the benchmarks page.
Claude Code with Augment has not been run against Claude Code with Augment and GitMir on the same repository, so this page claims no result for that combination.
What changes, and what does not.
Is GitMir a replacement for Augment?
No. Augment answers where the implementation is and what it looks like. GitMir answers what the product does and what a change would mean.
Do the two products talk to each other?
No. Both can be sources inside the same client, which is your side of the workflow, not an arrangement between the two companies.
Keep your stack. Add the product layer.
Connect one repository and see what the agent does with a product model above its code context.
3,000 STARTING CREDITS INCLUDED · YOU SEE THE ESTIMATE BEFORE A BUILD STARTS · PROCESSING STOPS WITH YOUR BALANCE AND RESUMES AFTER A TOP-UP