Cursor · CodeRabbit · GitMir

Understand the product. Build the change. Review the change.

GitMir holds the shared product model and its history. Cursor implements. CodeRabbit reviews independently. Three layers over one change, each doing its own job.

KEEP YOUR EXISTING WORKFLOW.

Workflow The two products are used side by side, by a person or by the agent they run. Nothing passes directly between them.

Your stack today

What these tools already do well.

Cursor

  • Reads and edits code across the repository
  • Searches the codebase and plans a change
  • Runs its agent inside the editor the team already lives in
  • Connects to external tools and data through MCP

GitMir is another source of intelligence — at the product level.

CodeRabbit

  • Reviews a change with codebase and organizational context
  • Explains impact and risk, not only the diff
  • Reviews what people write and what agents write
  • Holds an independent review and governance layer

Review stays where it is. GitMir keeps the product-level before and after.

The product layer

Who does what

  • GitMir — shared product model and product-level history
  • Cursor — the implementation
  • CodeRabbit — independent review and governance
The workflow

One change, three layers, no overlap.

Today

  1. Request
  2. Implement
  3. Pull request
  4. Review
  5. Merge

With GitMir

  1. Request
  2. Product model and history
  3. Implement
  4. Pull request
  5. Review
  6. Product-level difference kept after the merge
The flow

One change, three layers

  1. GitMirproduct model and history
  2. Cursorimplementation
  3. Pull requestthe change, proposed
  4. CodeRabbitindependent review
  5. GitMirproduct-level difference across analyzed commits

A workflow map. None of the three is automatically triggered by another.

Product proof

See the layer that outlives the pull request.

The public Supabase model holds the product state and what analyzed commits changed in it — readable long after the review thread is closed.

The change on the table

What could break if subscription cancellation changes?

An example, so you can see the answer without uploading anything of yours.

What the product says about it
  • Areas it reachesBilling & Subscription · Support · Usage · Project Settings · Organization
  • RecordsSubscription · DiskAttributes · OrganizationUsage
  • Actions · 9updateOrgSubscription · confirmPendingSubscriptionChange · sendDowngradeFeedback
  • Endpoints · 8PUT /platform/organizations/{slug}/billing/subscription · POST /platform/feedback/downgrade
  • Screens · 7cancel or downgrade the subscription · change the plan
  • Customer pathsChange an organization's plan
Read from 83 files · 18.7 KB served against 0.17 MB of sourceOpen it and ask your own →
What has been measured

One run, published in full.

The one measurement GitMir has published is a 50-question run over a single repository, Supabase. It compared context systems answering the same questions, graded blind against repository evidence.

92%of answers correct, against 78% for the best-scoring alternative in that run
8.4Ktokens of context per question, against 27.4K
$0.07per question, against $0.19
Not measured

Cursor with CodeRabbit has not been run against Cursor, CodeRabbit and GitMir on the same repository, so this page claims no result for that combination.

Product change history

See what changed in the product — not only what changed in the code.

GitMir updates the product representation from analyzed commits and keeps the product-level difference between versions: what the product does, the rules behind it, the things it works with, and the areas they touch.

Keep your stack. Add the product layer.

Connect one repository and keep the product-level before and after of everything you ship.

3,000 STARTING CREDITS INCLUDED · YOU SEE THE ESTIMATE BEFORE A BUILD STARTS · PROCESSING STOPS WITH YOUR BALANCE AND RESUMES AFTER A TOP-UP