Review the change
Preserve what it changed in the product
CodeRabbit provides an independent layer for reviewing, explaining and governing software changes. GitMir adds a product-level before and after that outlives the pull request it came from.
KEEP YOUR EXISTING WORKFLOW.
Workflow The two products are used side by side, by a person or by the agent they run. Nothing passes directly between them.
What CodeRabbit already does well
CodeRabbit
CodeRabbit- Reviews a change with codebase and organizational context
- Explains impact and risk, not only the diff
- Reviews what people write and what agents write
- Holds an independent review and governance layer
Review stays where it is. GitMir keeps the product-level before and after.
What GitMir adds
- The product model before the change
- The product-level difference the change produced
- The product model after it
- A history of what the product does, the rules behind it and how states change, across analyzed commits
Independent change review, plus a product history that survives the merge
Today
- Proposed change
- Review, risk and governance
- Merge
- The reasoning lives in the pull request
With GitMir
- Proposed change
- Review, risk and governance
- Merge
- Product-level difference kept across analyzed commits
- Readable months later, without the pull request
Two layers over the same change, running independently. Neither one reads the other's output.
Two layers over one change
- Proposed changea pull request
- CodeRabbitreview, risk, governance and evidence on the change itself
- GitMirthe product before, the product-level difference, the product after
The two branches run in parallel over the same change. Nothing passes between the products.
See a product-level difference on a real repository
The public Supabase model carries the product state and what analyzed commits changed in it — the same record a reviewer would want six months after the pull request is closed.
What must an AI agent know before changing billing?
An example, so you can see the answer without uploading anything of yours.
- Areas it reachesBilling & Subscription · Organization · Usage · Partner Onboarding · Project Settings
- RecordsSubscription · Invoice · PaymentMethod · CustomerProfile · Entitlement · ProjectAddon
- Actions · 33updateOrgSubscription · topUpCredits · redeemCode
- Endpoints · 27PUT /platform/organizations/{slug}/billing/subscription · POST .../billing/credits/top-up
- Screens · 33payment methods · organization billing and usage
- Customer pathsChange an organization's plan
One run, published in full
The one measurement GitMir has published is a 50-question run over a single repository, Supabase. It compared context systems answering the same questions, graded blind against repository evidence.
It did not measure a review workflow. A CodeRabbit review with a GitMir product history beside it has not been compared against the same review without one, so this page claims no result for that combination.
See what changed in the product — not only what changed in the code
GitMir updates the product representation from analyzed commits and keeps the product-level difference between versions: what the product does, the rules behind it, the things it works with, and the areas they touch.
What changes, and what does not
Is GitMir a replacement for CodeRabbit?
No. CodeRabbit reviews the change. GitMir records what the change did to the product.
Does CodeRabbit read GitMir's model?
No. The two run independently over the same change, and neither consumes the other's output.
Keep your stack. Add the product layer
Connect one repository and keep the product-level before and after of every change you review.
10,000 STARTING CREDITS INCLUDED · YOU SEE THE ESTIMATE BEFORE A BUILD STARTS · PROCESSING STOPS WITH YOUR BALANCE AND RESUMES AFTER A TOP-UP