Review the behavior that matters, not every file that moved.
See which product logic a change reaches and compare implementation with the intended requirement or expected behavior.
GitMir describes what a change did to the product rather than to the files, so a review can start from behaviour. For work that was written down and closed in GitMir, you can also read what a task promised to touch next to what it actually changed — including the parts of the product it changed without naming them.
Open the repository and pick the build that carries the change you are reviewing.
Read what appeared, went away, was renamed, or now behaves differently.
On the Documents screen, name the thing the change touches to see the risk level and what depends on it, nearest first.
Open closed work on the Work screen and read what each task promised against what it actually changed.
Check the shape of all this on a real repository first, without an account, on the published Supabase history.
It is not a test runner and it does not read your test results: it says what the product does differently, not whether that is correct. The promise-versus-changed comparison exists only for work recorded on the Work screen and closed through it — a commit that never went through a task has nothing to be set against. And it compares analysed builds, not every commit in the repository.
See it on a real product.
Three models are published in full and open without an account. Ask one of them the question this page is about.