Replace document chasing with a repeatable workflow

Know when essential subcontractor documents expire. A focused expiry and completeness workflow can reduce administrative chasing without attempting to certify regulatory compliance.

Start with your market Model your opportunity

Buyer and gap hypothesis

Gap hypothesis. Small general contractors may track subcontractor documents across folders, emails and spreadsheets. A focused expiry and completeness workflow can reduce administrative chasing without attempting to certify regulatory compliance.

ICP and product. Target contractors coordinating 20–150 subcontractors. The MVP provides upload requests, buyer-defined document checklists, expiry reminders, a missing-items dashboard and a reviewer decision log. A qualified human decides whether documents satisfy the project's requirements.

The connected workflow

MarketResearches document-management alternatives and gaps in small-team usability.
ICPIdentifies businesses with frequent subcontractor onboarding.
GoBotsTurns the chosen opportunity into a focused product model, requirements and approved build tasks.
IntelligenceRepresents organisations, projects, documents, expiry dates and review states.
Vibe/ComputeBuilds the request-and-review loop.
Business ReviewInspects who can access documents and when reminders fire.
OutreachOffers a paid pilot for one live project.
FeedbackFeedback from administrators determines which checklist and reminder features deserve expansion.

Outreach prepares the messages; a person sends them and handles the replies. Proposed automated actions need supported connectors, customer permissions and configured release and send rules.

Products in this workflow

Modelled investment and revenue

Illustrative scenarioIllustrative investment: $5,500

Operator time (80 hours at $40/hour)	$3,200
GitMir, agent and model allowance	$900
Infrastructure/storage	$500
Acquisition experiments	$900
Illustrative investment	$5,500

MVP assumption: 3–4 weeks.

Modelled target20 customers × $199/month = $3,980 MRR in a 4–8 month test, with explicit storage and subcontractor limits

If the operator is an unpaid founder, the initial cash need is $2,300 — the investment without the operator's time. The GitMir, agent and model allowance is provisional, not GitMir published pricing. MRR is gross revenue, not profit: taxes, refunds, implementation fees and ongoing software, API, support and acquisition costs are not included.

Scenario — example inputs, replace them with yours

Model your opportunity

Monthly price per customer ($)New paying customers per monthMonths modelledGross margin (%)Monthly churn (%)Acquisition cost per new customer ($)Support cost per customer per month ($)Build cost before launch ($)

Cash received over the period: $20,053
Month-end MRR: $4,304
Monthly contribution in the last month: $3,010
Cumulative cash at the end: −$1,025
Break-even month: not reached

Each month: customers = previous × (1 − churn) + new; revenue = customers × price; contribution = revenue × margin − customers × support; cumulative cash starts at −build cost and adds contribution minus new customers × acquisition cost. Gross revenue, not profit; taxes, refunds and overhead are not included. Your numbers stay in this page.

Pilot gates

Secure three paid pilots and approved checklist definitions. Test expiry calculations, access isolation and exportability. Track onboarding time and incomplete-document follow-ups. Never present a green dashboard as proof of legal compliance; the product records the buyer's review decision.

Start with your market

Model your opportunity before you build it.

Start with your market All business scenarios